![]() ![]() I have run many photos through both Topaz Denoise AI and Sharpen AI. There can be a lot of subtle detail that is very photo dependent and camera sensor sensitive. This can be a complex question, but I'll give you my simple answer. Moreover, the RAW images are only little 20Mp items from a Lumix FZ1000 or 12Mb from an Olympus TG6. PS Processing power is not too much of an issue, with a fat GPU and CPU eager for work within the Windows PC. What do you Topaz/LR users prefer as a workflow and why?Īny advice and further insights/corrections to improve my understanding will be welcome. followed by a final export into an 8-bit jpeg for general use, sharing, sending to others and so forth. On the other hand, I generally do export LR-edited RAW files as PSDs for any final tweaks in Photoshop. Using Topaz products as plug-ins within LR would be more convenient - but at the cost of losing the RAW file, if the Topaz results (along with any LR edits) can only be exported/used as a TIFF or PSD file. If I have this right, would it therefore be best to use Topaz first, on my from-camera RAW files, as a stand-alone noise-reduction "editor", followed by procesing in Lightroom on the resultant DNG file to do the usual things I might do to a RAW file in Lightroom to improve the photo? As I understand it, doing noise reduction as a first step will give a better quality (DNG) file for LR edits, which edits will have a greatly reduced tendency to exagerate noise, since noise will have already been eliminated or reduced.? If you check the box in External Editor Preferences to "Stack with Original".There's already a thread for this but it seems to be discussing the Topaz noise reduction software used as a plug-in rather than as a stand-alone product.Īm I right, though, in thinking that use of the Topaz products as plug-ins to LR means that any original RAW file must be exported as a TIFF or other non-RAW file format following processing by the Topaz plug-in? The alternative seems to be to use a Topaz product as a stand-alone editor first, which can then have a DNG file as the export following the noise reduction (or whatever else Topaz processing does). The file returned may not meet the criteria for the Smart Collection and will be found in the folder with the original file.Īnother thing to consider is Stacking. Another mistake is working from a Smart Collection. The most common mistake is that the Grid view is sorted in "Added Order" and the last file added is going to be at the end of the group. If the file is returned to Lightroom and you can't find it, there are several possible situations the prevent you from finding the Topaz edited file. If I choose "Export", the saved Topaz file is returned to Lightroom. In some situations, I get an option to "Export " in Topaz. "Accept" is the function that I want to use to return the edited file to LrC. In some other situations, Topaz will ask me if I want to "Export". What I do find are two functions "Save Look" and " "Accept".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |